Monday night was CWF. No big deal other than it means leaving the house in the evening and being out until nearly bedtime. Tonight is piano. Wednesday is Elders/Board and I am now the de facto head elder (who does scheduling, and who really is supposed to find a devotional, except I don't think I'm going to do one this month).
I'm looking forward to Thursday.
(Also, today, my department has its meeting with the Dean, and
I did get in a couple of rows on the Hagrid sweater. And I worked on the new "had to start it" project.
When I made that run down to Sherman (where I complained about the terrible, selfish drivers), I did go to the Hobby Lobby. I bought two skeins of a Paton's Lace yarn (this is roughly a sportweight, mostly acrylic with some wool. And the variety I have has tiny sequins strung through it). And it was purple.
Purple, fluffy, sparkles. Heh. I am more of a girly-girl now than when I was 8. I wouldn't have cared about the yarn at 8 but now at 44 I look at it and go, "I really want a lacy scarf made out of that."
What I wanted was a simple pattern - one that wouldn't require row-counting, one that would be very open, one that would be reversible. I rejected the first few I saw because they either were sufficiently complicated I'd have to count rows, or they carried the ominous "Will bias over large areas" warning (many eyelet patterns will do that). Finally, I found one called Turkish Stitch - one version of it is shown here but the version I used, from my beloved Super Stitches Knitting book, uses a skp rather than a k2tog.
(I know some people have found mistakes in it - I don't remember finding any in the stitches I've used - but I like the book. It's a nice size, the stitches are attractively photographed, and for some of the complex stitches charts are given. I tend to prefer charts and have gotten so I won't consider a stitch library book unless it has them. And I guess, mistakes, I've knitted for long enough that I can look at a pattern and figure out if something's hinky and fix it. That doesn't excuse mistakes but considering that I have both taught from and learned from two different stats texts that had some pretty serious typos - you can't expect perfection these days, most companies don't seem to proofread any more).
It's nice and simple - easy to work on when you're tired and it does give the open meshlike effect I was wanting.
No comments:
Post a Comment